.@JohnRiversToo @HbdNrx What about legitimate use of the term relative to anti-white racists?
imagine there are two groups in your society, and the other group consistently discriminates against yours. Is it
-
-
.
@HbdNrx@JohnRiversToo Don't have to imagine. Other group believes in coercion/violating indiv rts for PC bs.They're called "progressives." -
you're not answering the question
-
.
@HbdNrx@JohnRiversToo I am. You've mis-identified the groups. -
I didn't identify any groups. I'm just asking you a question
-
.
@HbdNrx@JohnRiversToo Since you haven't explicitly identified any groups, I did. Statists must be opposed b/c of actions not colors. -
can you just try to answer the question directly?
-
.
@HbdNrx@JohnRiversToo Your question presupposes several premises I disagree with. (1 of 3)pic.twitter.com/yKebdq9suq
-
.
@HbdNrx@JohnRiversToo You're shifting purpose of morality from survival of individual to that of a “group,” how is this justified? (2 of 3 - 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
more moral to: 1) treat everyone equally, resulting in your group consistently losing and dying out, or
-
2) favor your kind in response.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.