If you think of a country's commons & government as owned by its people--in the same way shareholders own a corporation--
-
-
It would be reasonable to try issuing shares in the country/government to current voters (or a subset) and making those shares transferrable
-
and divisible. New shares would no longer be issued for free.
-
This is not to say that I really believe in the shareholder voting model of corporations either, but it may be an improvement.
-
Regarding voting, generally: in tests, the best decisions tend to come from groups of no more than 7 people.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
hmm, property owners may actually want mass immigration (short-sightedly),but they won't want to dilute their voting rights
-
Tweet unavailable
-
That's true. Normally I think of immigration as dilution, but under the shareholder system it would be less dilutive.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Actually soon the non-idiots would wind up holding a disproportionate number of the votes. And then there would be riots again.
-
having only non-idiots voting would be great, and the riots could be put down
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.