nothing will improve unless we get atthe incorrect progressive assumptions eg blank slate and clarify implications
-
-
thats fine if you think so but I cant see where you come to the conclusion we are talking about different things.
-
(note cont: ive read darwin, huxley vsydow, wilson, neuman,stewart, nagel, etc and still remain unconvinced)
-
ok, maybe you are thinking of the same thing. Are you familiar with this:https://www.amazon.com/Genetic-Interests-Ethnicity-Humanity-Migration/dp/1412805961 …
-
I've been intending to write a little more in relation to this soon
-
I may be experimenting with getting emacs and kernel comboed to get a blog running for such exploration
-
just know there will be at least one dude who will check your work.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
(note: Im working through theories of nature till someone beyond bryces old stuff steelmans gnon)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
a productive path for you may still be the "for whom, for what" angles of rhetorical construction
-
there are various facts and relationships that can be empircally and/or logically generated but...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.