iirc the verbal correlation was slightly stronger than math. But I'm skeptical
-
-
Replying to @HbdNrx
Have you seen Griffe du Lion's essays on this? Tidy explanation. Could be spurious, but data is contra your intuition
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HbdNrx
Fair enough. But you accept the basic puzzle, right? Your STEMmish instinct (VP-iq über alles!) isn't in the data
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InaneImperium
for one thing math, visuospatial, and verbal are all different. I am only considering math and verbal, and...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx
Oh, is that right? I was under impression that are called "verbal" and "math" are more properly analytic/visuospatial
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InaneImperium
ok I'm really not sure actually. Here's the la griffe link: http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/sft2.htm
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx @InaneImperium
verbal was a better fit than general IQ due to Asian countries.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx @InaneImperium
anyway, as far as I can tell we have very limited information overall on this question of the value of verbal vs
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx @InaneImperium
other components of an IQ test for a society.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
of course we know that IQ (g) in general is highly valuable. I'm skeptical about verbal being any more valuable
-
-
Replying to @HbdNrx @InaneImperium
possibly Asian countries may also be explained by some kind of creativity component that we can't measure well
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx
Creativity ("q") is possible, but speculative; GdL's model seems to show q just IS right tail of verbal component of g.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.