iirc the verbal correlation was slightly stronger than math. But I'm skeptical
-
-
of course we know that IQ (g) in general is highly valuable. I'm skeptical about verbal being any more valuable
-
possibly Asian countries may also be explained by some kind of creativity component that we can't measure well
-
Creativity ("q") is possible, but speculative; GdL's model seems to show q just IS right tail of verbal component of g.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.