iirc the verbal correlation was slightly stronger than math. But I'm skeptical
-
-
anyway, as far as I can tell we have very limited information overall on this question of the value of verbal vs
-
other components of an IQ test for a society.
-
of course we know that IQ (g) in general is highly valuable. I'm skeptical about verbal being any more valuable
-
possibly Asian countries may also be explained by some kind of creativity component that we can't measure well
-
Creativity ("q") is possible, but speculative; GdL's model seems to show q just IS right tail of verbal component of g.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, exactly. Asian countries are the big counterexample where advantage of visuospatial skills should show, IF it is--
-
true that v-sp is worse individually, better for collective good. But instead we see the EXACT opposite.
-
I don't have specific visuospatial data. Only verbal and general.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.