"anthropomorphisation of natural/divine law" is also how it's phrased here: http://www.socialmatter.net/the-compendium/#Gnon …
-
-
Replying to @CheshireOcelot @Piragon_
however then it becomes "Big Tent Equivocation" - is it Divine Law? Or Darwinism Personified?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PorphyCoon @Piragon_
there is some danger of that, but in NRx's context I don't think Darwinism is far removed from >>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CheshireOcelot @Piragon_
>> Natural Law, which is a valid and useful concept.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CheshireOcelot
That's why I said "good as far as it goes" but it remains equivocal thus I think
@Piragon_ concerns r valid1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PorphyCoon @Piragon_
ah, I missed your earlier tweets. Reading them now, I think we're actually mostly in agreement.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @Piragon_ @CheshireOcelot
🐸 hbd nrx 🐸 Retweeted 🐸 hbd nrx 🐸
🐸 hbd nrx 🐸 added,
10:19 PM - 29 Jun 2016
1 reply
0 retweets
1 like
-
-
Well, that's a Gnonist answer at least.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.