If you think of a country's commons & government as owned by its people--in the same way shareholders own a corporation--
-
-
Any comments on the tweets above re issuing shares in a country?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If voters actually had a real ownership interest in government, maybe they wouldn't do such dumb things with their votes (like immigration)
-
It would be reasonable to try issuing shares in the country/government to current voters (or a subset) and making those shares transferrable
-
and divisible. New shares would no longer be issued for free.
-
This is not to say that I really believe in the shareholder voting model of corporations either, but it may be an improvement.
-
Regarding voting, generally: in tests, the best decisions tend to come from groups of no more than 7 people.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
hmm, property owners may actually want mass immigration (short-sightedly),but they won't want to dilute their voting rights
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Sound good man!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.