Main point of the post last night is that I think America is headed toward a political environment of a white party vs. a nonwhite party.
-
-
Replying to @HbdNrx
Ideology independent of race will not dominate the discourse--instead, things will increasingly be about racial spoils.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
As such, the nonwhite party has a strong short-term interest in bringing in as many more of their own kind as possible.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
Affirmative Actn,minority contracting,diversity coordinators, and disparate impact are examples of the spoils available to the nonwhite side
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
Interesting little-known fact: 1948 Republican party platform was anti-communist and pro-civil rights. Dems were racist + socialist.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx
Today socialism and "anti-racism" align, which is natural given the distribution of wealth by race.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Of course, the USSR was always very anti-HBD (See Lysenkoism). People were to be genetically equal as well as economically equal.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.