@RonSchweinlach @david_kenneth_d given all those facts and an unbiased evaluation, the probability Zim struck first is near zero.
-
-
Replying to @HbdNrx
@HbdNrx@david_kenneth_d after reading your page that is a huge reach.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ronmcdouble
@RonSchweinlach
@david_kenneth_d in contrast, the best evidence the anti-Zim side has is, "he was creepy and might have followed Trayvon"2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx
@HbdNrx@david_kenneth_d well he definitely followed that's not in question. Also trayvon is dead so Zimmerman definitely killed him.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ronmcdouble
@RonSchweinlach
@david_kenneth_d case closed, I guess1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
@HbdNrx@david_kenneth_d there is no physical evidence of who "struck first". That ambiguity benefits the survivor.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ronmcdouble
@RonSchweinlach
@david_kenneth_d Z would have known he'd get his ass kicked if he started something. He's no fighter, has no reason to punch2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
@RonSchweinlach
@david_kenneth_d no reason for Z to be that pissed at T. In contrast, T was mad that Z saw is criminal acrivity2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HbdNrx
@HbdNrx@david_kenneth_d sorry but this isn't evidence this is you playing psychologist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@RonSchweinlach @david_kenneth_d you saw the evidence. These are interpretations
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.