@RonSchweinlach @david_kenneth_d all very clear
@RonSchweinlach @david_kenneth_d given all those facts and an unbiased evaluation, the probability Zim struck first is near zero.
-
-
@HbdNrx@david_kenneth_d after reading your page that is a huge reach. -
@RonSchweinlach
@david_kenneth_d in contrast, the best evidence the anti-Zim side has is, "he was creepy and might have followed Trayvon" -
@HbdNrx@david_kenneth_d well he definitely followed that's not in question. Also trayvon is dead so Zimmerman definitely killed him. -
@RonSchweinlach
@david_kenneth_d case closed, I guess -
@HbdNrx@david_kenneth_d there is no physical evidence of who "struck first". That ambiguity benefits the survivor. -
@RonSchweinlach
@david_kenneth_d Z would have known he'd get his ass kicked if he started something. He's no fighter, has no reason to punch -
@RonSchweinlach
@david_kenneth_d no reason for Z to be that pissed at T. In contrast, T was mad that Z saw is criminal acrivity -
@RonSchweinlach
@david_kenneth_d *activity - 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.