Feminists are screaming that @rooshv is pro-rape, but here's the reality:
rhetorical device in arguing against feminist inconsistencies. The reality is that he believes that lack of consent is
-
-
slippery and often hard to prove, so many men get unfairly accused of rape. This also means that some actually raped women
-
just don't have proof.Roosh proposes to solve this issue by making the legal standard for rape clearer and easier to prove,if less expansive
-
I expect that his actual position, stripped of the "modest proposal" rhetoric is more along the lines of:
-
clear evidence of lack of consent should be required before rape cases proceed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.