.@DjehutiHotep against whites as whites commit against blacks. We expect the b-on-w and w-on-b numbers to be equal given equal criminality &
-
-
Replying to @HbdNrx
.
@DjehutiHotep random targeting no matter what the population % is. If this sounds wrong, consider a town with 100 b and 900 w where 10%1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
.
@DjehutiHotep of each population randomly commits a crime each year. So, 90 crimes by whites and 10 crimes by blacks. Of those 901 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
.
@DjehutiHotep crimes by whites against random victims, 81 should be against whites and 9 against blacks. Of the 10 crimes by blacks, 91 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
.
@DjehutiHotep should be against whites and 1 should be against blacks. Notice the expected numbers here and compare to the above:1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
.
@DjehutiHotep 81 w-on-w, 9 b-on-w, 9 w-on-b, 1 b-on-b. Instead of being equal, b-on-w is in reality more than 4 times w-on-b. Next we can1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx
.
@DjehutiHotep add up the total number of crimes of violence with a white offender and total with a black offender: 1.97M and 798k (2768k1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
.
@DjehutiHotep total), or 71% and 29% of the black and white total.We expect those numbers to be proportional to population,but they aren't.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
.
@DjehutiHotep The US in 2010 was 63.7% nonhispanic white and 12.2% nonhispanic black, meaning whites were 84% of the combined total1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
.
@DjehutiHotep and blacks were 16%.Notice that instead of 84% and 16% above,we have 71% and 29%, again meaning that blacks are substantially1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
.@DjehutiHotep overrepresented among criminals. Nice try, though.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.