“Don’t try to ‘win.’ Don’t try to ‘convince’ anyone of your viewpoint. Don’t score points by mocking…” — @SeanBlanda https://medium.com/@SeanBlanda/the-other-side-is-not-dumb-2670c1294063#.vkx5n9om4 …
-
-
Replying to @SpiritSplice
@SpiritSplice@JamesPsychol So what's the end game? How do you think you should convince them of your belief?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SeanBlanda
@SeanBlanda@SpiritSplice@JamesPsychol so, where does discourse go wrong? Very often people argue past each other, not really1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
@SeanBlanda@SpiritSplice@JamesPsychol addressing what the other side is saying. People are also often unclear about their own position.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
@SeanBlanda@SpiritSplice@JamesPsychol So,first define the disagreement.Then try to figure out why the other side takes position they do1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx
@SeanBlanda@SpiritSplice@JamesPsychol Most of the time some underlying difference in assumptions or factual understanding can be found.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @SpiritSplice
@SpiritSplice@SeanBlanda@JamesPsychol I liked this on sources of disagreement http://lesswrong.com/lw/kxb/nrx_vs_prog_assumptions_locating_the_sources_of/ …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@SpiritSplice @SeanBlanda @JamesPsychol tldr: progs assume civilization is robust, don't prioritize survival, assume blank slate
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.