@IWFBuckley Not food very much, if at all. Probably not the "environment" you're thinking. @hbdchick
-
-
Replying to @AntiMarxists
@IWFBuckley
@JayMan471@hbdchick People usually use "environment" as broad factors that can be changed, not random unchangeable microfactors2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
@HbdNrx@hbdchick @IWFBuckley@JayMan471 That's because broad factors that can be changed is a perfectly good use of the word environment.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Mangan150
@Mangan150@hbdchick @IWFBuckley@JayMan471 well if you just separate genetics vs. everything else and call it environment it is confusing2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AntiMarxists
@IWFBuckley
@Mangan150@hbdchick@JayMan471 one attempt is "shared environment" vs. "unshared environment" in twin studies, which captures2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AntiMarxists
@IWFBuckley Maybe it won't, at least not the ones to your health.
@HbdNrx@Mangan150@hbdchick1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JayMan471
@JayMan471 @IWFBuckley@Mangan150@hbdchick obviously certain specific actions can result in disease and death. If living like a hippie1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@JayMan471 @IWFBuckley @Mangan150 @hbdchick results in free love with everyone, you're a lot more likely to die of an STD
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.