@EndTaysachs @DecimusSaxon @BigBlackOracle @TheDefJef @MrCyberBully limiting voting to 130+ IQ would be a big improvement
@Martin17773 @EndTaysachs @DecimusSaxon anti-democracy arguments aside, it seems pretty much objectively better to limit voting to
-
-
@Martin17773@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon people with better problem solving capabilities and higher future time orientation. -
@Martin17773@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon However, to be fair, there are some other correlations: possible excessive altruism among -
@Martin17773@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon higher IQ, possibly more susceptible to prog morality -
@HbdNrx@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon No. No. IQ thinking is accelerant. You need Christopher Dawson and lots of him.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@HbdNrx@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon IQ now, after 2 generations of meritocracy is absolutely not useful. -
@Martin17773@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon disagree. The SAT is still useful, and it's essentially an IQ test. Tests in school are still useful -
@HbdNrx@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon Give you a helpfull example, leadership of NSDAP and Stalinists all of superior intelligence. -
@HbdNrx@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon Again not trying to hassle you, but 'useful' is different from taking it ultimately seriously.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.