@EndTaysachs @DecimusSaxon @BigBlackOracle @TheDefJef @MrCyberBully limiting voting to 130+ IQ would be a big improvement
@Martin17773 @EndTaysachs @DecimusSaxon @BigBlackOracle @TheDefJef I'd rather make sure we only have smart people vote. Bonus: few blacks
-
-
@HbdNrx@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon@BigBlackOracle@TheDefJef It was afterall tht thinking tht got us into this mess http://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2015/09/fall-meritocracy/#_ftn2 … -
@Martin17773@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon@BigBlackOracle@TheDefJef long article, but yes the left hates IQ. I think it's very useful -
@HbdNrx@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon@BigBlackOracle@TheDefJef As long as we're on the same page 'useful' is the right word. -
@Martin17773@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon anti-democracy arguments aside, it seems pretty much objectively better to limit voting to -
@Martin17773@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon people with better problem solving capabilities and higher future time orientation. -
@Martin17773@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon However, to be fair, there are some other correlations: possible excessive altruism among -
@Martin17773@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon higher IQ, possibly more susceptible to prog morality -
@HbdNrx@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon No. No. IQ thinking is accelerant. You need Christopher Dawson and lots of him.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@HbdNrx@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon@BigBlackOracle@TheDefJef Smart like population of Harvard? http://conversationswithbillkristol.org/transcript/david-gelernter-transcript/ … terrifying. -
@Martin17773@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon@BigBlackOracle@TheDefJef Harvard also selects for Cathedral ideology. Anyway, I'm not saying it -
@Martin17773@EndTaysachs@DecimusSaxon@BigBlackOracle@TheDefJef would be perfect. It's just better than having actual dumb people vote
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.