@Yann_Perrod from the gene perspective, this seems accurate to me. Note: there is more Neanderthal DNA in existence today than ever.
-
-
Replying to @HbdNrx
@Yann_Perrod The Neanderthal admixture may have helped both groups in the end (until now), at least compared to Neanderthal extermination1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Yann_Perrod
@Yann_Perrod that argument only works if they can show that that combination will end up dominating, but the odds are bad for it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
@Yann_Perrod in other words, they should show why that combination is advantageous. I sure don't see it. Penis size doesn't cut it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Yann_Perrod
@Yann_Perrod Is the argument more "'l' am not my genes", or is it more "advantageous is socially constructed"?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Yann_Perrod
@Yann_Perrod yeah, well Darwinian selection doesn't care what we think about it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Yann_Perrod in the long-term, selection will favor those who don't think it's silly
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.