Universalists (progressives) need to realize that their whole ideology fails once some people begin to look out for their group first.
-
-
Replying to @HbdNrx
If everyone is on board with universalism, it can be pretty nice--everyone will pursue the common good.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
But once you have groups who aren't cooperating (ie identity politics, defection), everything decays.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx
I see ethnic homogeneity within nations as the only effective way to minimize this problem. Otherwise, inevitable conflict and defection.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
In other words, in the words of the illustrious Heartiste, diversity + proximity = war
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx
If you look out for the good of everyone equally while some others look out for their own good first, who will eventually come out on top?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
This is the state of white-nonwhite relations today, including refugees, blm, etc. Meanwhile SJWs get it backwards and assume whites are
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @HbdNrx
(Great example of victim-blaming.) Of course, they'd be right if their assumption of biological equality were true.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
The answer is to create communities where people aren't dividing themselves by identity (to some reasonable level of size and homogeneity).
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
At its core, I think #NRx is a pretty fundamental result of game theory + HBD.
-
-
Replying to @HbdNrx
Basically it's a bad idea to have competing identity groups in the same geographic space. In nature, competition leads to 1 species in niche
1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.