@BPieWHAT @RealDoctorWhite I think you're having some trouble understanding these statistics. Perhaps reading the whole paper would clarify
@BPieWHAT @RealDoctorWhite nope. The next segment in color of crime that you're reading is referring to *all crime*, not just interracial
-
-
@HbdNrx@RealDoctorWhite if it refers to "all crimes" it would not say X% of victims are white. -
@BPieWHAT@RealDoctorWhite yes, and 40+ percent of victims of black crime are black...which is not interracial -
@HbdNrx@RealDoctorWhite that doesn't change the % of white victims. -
@BPieWHAT@RealDoctorWhite but we're not talking about the percentage of time blacks choose white victims. We're talking about the -
@BPieWHAT@RealDoctorWhite relative frequence of black-on-white vs. white-on-black crime -
@HbdNrx@RealDoctorWhite there was manipulation because it's 40 some %. 40 some is not 85 or 90. -
@BPieWHAT@RealDoctorWhite Look at it this way. Consider all interracial violent crime involving blacks and whites: black-on-white and -
@BPieWHAT@RealDoctorWhite white-on-black. If all targeting were random and criminality were equal, 50% should be black-on-white and 50% - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@HbdNrx@RealDoctorWhite "Forty- five percent of their victims are white" -
@BPieWHAT@RealDoctorWhite yes, and 40+ percent of their victims are black, it says immediately after -
@HbdNrx@RealDoctorWhite I am reading that. My point is, it doesn't cause the % of white victims to increase!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@HbdNrx@RealDoctorWhite no it's not. It plainly says word for word exactly what I'm saying. It is still under interracial crimes.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.