.@SanguineEmpiric I'll briefly explain my position on ethnic/racial groups and immigration in the responses here.
@SanguineEmpiric I agree with you that taking the cream of the crop from other nations is a good idea if you want your nation to outcompete
-
-
@SanguineEmpiric others. Intelligence is particularly valuable, so orienting your immigration policy around it is a good start. However,
-
@SanguineEmpiric I'm also concerned with internal conflict. Different genetic groups have different psychological characteristics, and they
-
@SanguineEmpiric have different political preferences. They also each have varying degrees of in-group preference. A country composed of 50%
-
@SanguineEmpiric each of two highly distinct high-IQ groups who each have strong in-group preferences will be in constant internal conflict
-
@SanguineEmpiric . The best combination is probably to have a fairly homogeneous country (~90%+ composed of people who are fairly closely
-
@SanguineEmpiric related genetically and who see themselves as one group) but to allow small numbers of people from other groups who will
-
@SanguineEmpiric contribute to your country and not get into conflict with your people. This means you want the people who are not only the
-
@SanguineEmpiric highest IQ but also the most similar psychologically and politically to your people. It's a huge mistake to allow people
-
@SanguineEmpiric in who will form noticeable groups and end up in conflict with your own people, as we can see in Europe and America today.
-
@SanguineEmpiric IQ can mitigate this problem, but it doesn't always make it go away (see Germans, Jews prior to 1945).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.