#NRx is many things. The First Thing it is is People. People who like to do social science from an evolutionary perspective.
-
-
Replying to @Nick_B_Steves
@Nick_B_Steves IOW if evolution isn't devoid of teleology; can it be relied upon to generate the non teleological grounding#NRx 's aim too?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KalishJantzen
@KalishJantzen B4 I struggle too long over this Q. 1)Do we agree evo is NOT devoid of teleology? 2)Why wld#Nrx AIM at non-teleolog ground?1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Nick_B_Steves
@Nick_B_Steves Yes. Some seemingly are insisting it is. Others have suggested that goal should be finding a 'non religious ground' for#NRx.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KalishJantzen
@KalishJantzen Hmph. I don't see why "A NEW APPROACH TO SOC SCI" would req "religious ground". Telos is metaphysical, but not nec religious.5 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Nick_B_Steves
@KalishJantzen But when#NRx looks around at successful civs, they all *just happen* to have been built upon/around relig. So...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Nick_B_Steves
@KalishJantzen You can be agnostic abt just how deep telos goes, but in terms of social order, relig (appears to be) REQ. Jim would agree.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Nick_B_Steves
@Nick_B_Steves@KalishJantzen#NRx needs to answer what about civilization is so worth working for. Progs place rights > civilization.3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
@Urban_IX @Nick_B_Steves @KalishJantzen progs seem to miss that losing civilization certainly won't result in having more "rights"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.