@HbdNrx @Costofles
I myself also *believe* that progism's unsustainable.
I have no *knowlege* about any particular 'inevitable' outcomes.
-
-
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@Aristokles11235 @Costofles no, I don't think you get it. Progressivism is fundamentally faith-based (universalism, blank slate, etc.)3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx
@HbdNrx@Aristokles11235 Right, but so is attributing some kind of intelligence or teleology to nature.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IdiotCubed
@Costofles
@Aristokles11235 I'm not attributing any intelligence or purpose to nature (I don't like the term teleology, actually)2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@HbdNrx @Costofles Do hold that humanity has a particular purpose/mission however. We have to work with nature but not necessarily for it.2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@HbdNrx @Costofles I'll accept your definition that Gnon's the selection process. It's clarifying. Wonder how many other NRxers will agree.1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@HbdNrx @Costofles It would mean that if we controlled the selection process (ie thru eugenics) we would in effect become Gnon.6 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@HbdNrx @Costofles The non-conscious/non-directed selection process would become conscious & directed. Evolution would become international3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@Aristokles11235@HbdNrx @Costofles The moment that evolution becomes intentional, we're ruined. We will not select for the right things.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
@380kmh @Aristokles11235 @Costofles I'm slightly more optimistic.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.