@Aristokles11235 @Costofles no, I don't think you get it. Progressivism is fundamentally faith-based (universalism, blank slate, etc.)
-
-
Replying to @HbdNrx
@HbdNrx@Aristokles11235 Right, but so is attributing some kind of intelligence or teleology to nature.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IdiotCubed
@Costofles
@Aristokles11235 I'm not attributing any intelligence or purpose to nature (I don't like the term teleology, actually)2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@Aristokles11235 @Costofles In reality, nature isn't "trying" to do anything in particular.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
@HbdNrx@Aristokles11235 Agreed. Which is why Gnon isn't a sufficient core for a pro-civilizational philosophy. More is required.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IdiotCubed
@Costofles
@Aristokles11235 I think you're missing something about the whole Gnon thing--it's just a poetic way of putting natural selection2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
@HbdNrx@Aristokles11235 Right, and the whole point is that natural selection is not a sufficient philosophical foundation for reaction.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IdiotCubed
@HbdNrx@Aristokles11235 Point is, neoreaction lacks the philosophical/metaphysical foundation necessary to create stabile civilization.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IdiotCubed
@Costofles
@HbdNrx If you're highest goal's mere survival you have a basis for life in a bunker not the makings of a great civilization.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
@Aristokles11235 @Costofles That is obviously not true in the long-term. Living in a bunker isn't going to be competitive.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.