@Aristokles11235 @Costofles more like the "intelligence" behind evolution. Gnon is the selection process
-
-
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@Aristokles11235 @Costofles not all of#NRx is religious1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@HbdNrx @Costofles Which is why I called it a cheat. Progs think history is on their side. NRx thinks gnon's on their's, right?1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@HbdNrx @Costofles If you think about both positions are 'secular religion' cheats. Not so different philosophically speaking.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@HbdNrx @Costofles I myself also *believe* that progism's unsustainable. I have no *knowlege* about any particular 'inevitable' outcomes.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@Aristokles11235 @Costofles no, I don't think you get it. Progressivism is fundamentally faith-based (universalism, blank slate, etc.)3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx
@Aristokles11235 @Costofles whereas#NRx is at least attempting to be grounded in reality see https://darwinianreactionary.wordpress.com/2015/01/15/teleofunction-not-tradition/ …2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx
@HbdNrx@Aristokles11235 Right, but again, if "teleofunctionality" is inevitable, then why is progism ascendant?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@Costofles @Aristokles11235 progressivism was adaptive in the past, but it is no longer adaptive due to technological and social changes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.