@HbdNrx Gnon also doesn't care much about civilization or stability. Witness the first two billions years of evolution.
-
-
@Aristokles11235 @Costofles whereas#NRx is at least attempting to be grounded in reality see https://darwinianreactionary.wordpress.com/2015/01/15/teleofunction-not-tradition/ … -
@HbdNrx@Aristokles11235 Right, but again, if "teleofunctionality" is inevitable, then why is progism ascendant? -
@Costofles
@Aristokles11235 progressivism was adaptive in the past, but it is no longer adaptive due to technological and social changes
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@HbdNrx@Aristokles11235 Right, but so is attributing some kind of intelligence or teleology to nature. -
@Costofles
@Aristokles11235 I'm not attributing any intelligence or purpose to nature (I don't like the term teleology, actually) -
@HbdNrx @Costofles I don't attribute any teleology to nature either. Nature only tries to maintain equilibrium at best. -
@Aristokles11235 @Costofles In reality, nature isn't "trying" to do anything in particular. -
@HbdNrx@Aristokles11235 Agreed. Which is why Gnon isn't a sufficient core for a pro-civilizational philosophy. More is required. -
@Costofles
@Aristokles11235 I think you're missing something about the whole Gnon thing--it's just a poetic way of putting natural selection -
@HbdNrx@Aristokles11235 Right, and the whole point is that natural selection is not a sufficient philosophical foundation for reaction. -
@HbdNrx@Aristokles11235 Point is, neoreaction lacks the philosophical/metaphysical foundation necessary to create stabile civilization. - 12 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@HbdNrx @Costofles Yes it is. I do get it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.