@Costofles @HbdNrx anti-counterfeiting is highly desirable so thats why we see things like Open-Transactions
-
-
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal@HbdNrx Not talking about the concept. Talking about the market pair BTC/USD.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IdiotCubed
@soapjackal@HbdNrx Mr. HBD's original tweet was about Bitcoin going to $0, not about blockchains being worthless.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IdiotCubed
@Costofles
@HbdNrx the inevitability of such as described in the initial tweet doesn't seem clear is where the disagreements are laying.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal@HbdNrx Eventually, it's inevitable. Doubtful that specific implementation of the concept will be around in say 10,000 years.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IdiotCubed
@soapjackal@HbdNrx Or even ten years, in my opinion. If the concept is solid another implementation will supplant BTC soon enough.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal@HbdNrx So, basically, you both agree. Forest for the trees, guys.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IdiotCubed
@Costofles
@HbdNrx I do not agree with his reasons why for the same reason I agree with OT1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal@HbdNrx I dunno, one of his early arguments was "clones" which means alternate implementations.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Costofles @soapjackal yes, this is the other reason bitcoin is going to 0
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.