@HbdNrx @Outsideness @AnarchoPapist @NRxNorth I read the link. Assumes that it pays literal cash money to be intrinsically valuable.
-
-
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal@Outsideness@AnarchoPapist @NRxNorth no, people will buy goods and services even if they can't sell them.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
@HbdNrx@Outsideness@AnarchoPapist @NRxNorth in which he posts the example of stocks that literally pay money in the form of dividends1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @soapjackal
@HbdNrx@Outsideness@AnarchoPapist @NRxNorth more over that usage of intrinsic value, by the authors own words, isnt the best predictor3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal Can you think of any other things that have held value over the long-term without any intrinsic value?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @soapjackal
@HbdNrx but goods you cannot sell and that do not produce cash returns do not have economic value1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal food has intrinsic value. you can eat it. gold has intrinsic value--it looks pretty, and has industrial applications1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @soapjackal
@HbdNrx also consider its far more likely that money arose out of debt measurement than barter properties1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@soapjackal I rather like this video on the subject (I think you'll enjoy it): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqvKjsIxT_8 …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.