@soapjackal @Outsideness @AnarchoPapist and I didn't disagree "in an economic sense"
@soapjackal @Outsideness @AnarchoPapist @NRxNorth in my view, that's not an intrinsic value (I may be defining the term 'intrinsic' narrowly
-
-
@HbdNrx@Outsideness@AnarchoPapist @NRxNorth thats because its not intrinsic value -
@soapjackal@Outsideness@AnarchoPapist @NRxNorth see the link in the other tweet on this. "Intrinsic value" is a term with diff interps -
@HbdNrx@Outsideness@AnarchoPapist @NRxNorth I read the link. Assumes that it pays literal cash money to be intrinsically valuable. -
@soapjackal@Outsideness@AnarchoPapist @NRxNorth no, people will buy goods and services even if they can't sell them. -
@HbdNrx@Outsideness@AnarchoPapist @NRxNorth in which he posts the example of stocks that literally pay money in the form of dividends -
@HbdNrx@Outsideness@AnarchoPapist @NRxNorth more over that usage of intrinsic value, by the authors own words, isnt the best predictor -
@soapjackal We all know that intrinsic value is not the only factor in the short-term price. The examples aren't as important as the def. -
@HbdNrx@soapjackal Even something useful can be worth $0 if you can't sell it. Say a used piece of 2x4 you find on the street. - 12 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.