@david_colquhoun @JenniferRaff No arrogance.Understood the implications.Wicherts argument about representativeness, not supposed limitations
@phillipcantor @JamesPsychol @david_colquhoun @JenniferRaff reality: you can use measures that help society, or use measures w/no disparity
-
-
.
@HbdNrx who's society? [@JamesPsychol@david_colquhoun@JenniferRaff] -
@phillipcantor@JamesPsychol@david_colquhoun@JenniferRaff you posed the question, you tell me -
.
@HbdNrx You said IQ can help society even though they are not equitable. You tell me how.@JamesPsychol@david_colquhoun@JenniferRaff -
@phillipcantor@JamesPsychol@david_colquhoun@JenniferRaff eg improving the selection of job candidates, resulting in greater productivity -
.
@HbdNrx@JamesPsychol@david_colquhoun@JenniferRaff So society benefits from higher profits for shareholders? Is that all? -
@phillipcantor@JamesPsychol@david_colquhoun@JenniferRaff society benefits from meritocracy. better to redistribute farther downstream -
.
@HbdNrx@JamesPsychol@david_colquhoun@JenniferRaff if meritocracy was real- http://www.ncsociology.org/sociationtoday/v21/merit.htm … Iet alone objective measurement of it. -
@phillipcantor@JamesPsychol@david_colquhoun@JenniferRaff departures from meritocracy don't mean meritocracy isn't desirable. IQ works - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.