(Should be framed as anti-anti-white though)
-
-
Replying to @HbdNrx @NullusMaximus
That’s an interesting point. How should the names be framed? Right now media would have no problem bashing an anti-anti-white group b/c they openly hates whites. But, they’d have to go through an explanation to bash a group named Anti Racism League/ Anti Bigotry League etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Roxanna_Watrous @NullusMaximus
The problem there is that the terms "bigotry" and "racism" can easily be used against us, and it's a battle we can't win. Unless we're simply trying to sow confusion, the focus needs to not be "we're the true anti-racists" but "we're standing up against anti-white hate"
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx @NullusMaximus
I get you, but they can be used against us regardless. Both types of names can be tested. Whatever works. We can use a broad name & operate w/ a narrow goal. I think the Proud Boys name hurt them. I’d use PC names. I’d make them print why for ex. The Anti-Racism League is bad.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
PC names can be weaponized against the Left. You can force them to attack PC names over & over again in order to attack the underlying group. I think it will help chip away at PC & identity politics. Who knows though? I’m all for testing to see the best approach.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Frog and I have discussed this before. You can not seriously accuse someone who wants to import Africa into their country of racism, but you can for everyone who disagrees with that. Hence rightists are always one step away from being racist. Left-wingers can with some
3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Why? I have a different take on that issue. I absolutely call it racism & go further. I say it’s ethnic cleansing through demographic replacement of our native population/voting electorate. In far left parties w/ 1 independent up for grabs I win w/ this framing every time.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
He's right, but not because their genocidal replacement plan isn't "racist" in some sense. Any nice white country will be pressured to accept nonwhite immigrants otherwise they're racist. Survival doesn't trump the immediacy of "not allowing all people in" is defined as "racist"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Leftist pressure is irrelevant w/o power. The power is in votes & winning elections. In the US we are pushing back & having the power fight now. We win w/ votes. More votes we get, the more of the problem w/ can fix. So the only thing we have to worry about is winning elections.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Roxanna_Watrous @HbdNrx and
So when I say I win the argument w/ my framing, I mean I literally won a person’s vote. I got them to agree to vote straight red. I’ve flipped life long Dems on this issue alone, even foreign ones. People understand that if you replace a population, you replace the culture.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
That can definitely work in individual cases, but I think we'll need a lot more priming before the masses are ready for it.
-
-
You’d be surprised at how easy a sell it is. The masses are ready now. It’s a winning issue. It used to be the Dem’s issue. Our main problem has been a bias press. Any ideas on getting around that one?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.