I realize that unauthorized immigration has costs, what I'm questioning is a) their significance relative to total costs b) the idea that building a wall would significantly reduce any of the costs associated with unauthorized immigration
-
-
If you're concerned about gov't spending there's loads of policies which are much more cost-effective and much lower-risk than building a wall or mass deportations would be.
-
Also, such expansive immigration policy would necessarily involve intrusive gov't intervention into civil society, which intuitively seems like it'd be something a "principled" NRx type should be opposed to. This isn't my area of expertise tho, so idk.
-
Building a wall is cheap and would save a lot of money. I don't see what the problem is.
-
Limiting immigration doesn't actually require much government intrusiveness. Mass deportation would, but that's also worth it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.