This person is not at all familiar with the costs of illegal immigration:https://twitter.com/_leftcat/status/1049855481529782272 …
-
-
I'm not making the argument that the wall would cost more than it would save, I'm arguing that building a wall wouldn't significantly reduce total gov't welfare and medical spending. You're not anticipating any arguments, you're deflecting.
-
Are you arguing that illegal immigrants don't cost US taxpayers tens of billions of dollars a year?
-
I'm arguing that building a wall won't significantly welfare and medical spending. Welfare and medical spending currently cost US taxpayers trillions of dollars a year. Are you arguing that building a wall would somehow save US tax payers hundreds of billions of dollars a year?
-
Obviously we can't save the total cost of illegal immigrants by building a wall--we'd also have to have mass deportation to save over a hundred billion dollars a year. But we can save on the additional costs from new illegal immigrants by building a wall.
-
Those additional costs are in the billions of dollars per year.
-
If you're concerned about gov't spending there's loads of policies which are much more cost-effective and much lower-risk than building a wall or mass deportations would be.
-
Also, such expansive immigration policy would necessarily involve intrusive gov't intervention into civil society, which intuitively seems like it'd be something a "principled" NRx type should be opposed to. This isn't my area of expertise tho, so idk.
-
Building a wall is cheap and would save a lot of money. I don't see what the problem is.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.