You're conflating pop "science" with actual science. The former includes a lot of misunderstanding of the latter. Actual science is a good thing.
We could talk about more recent great achievements of science like the germ theory of disease, evolution and its mechanism, nuclear bombs and power, electricity, computers, and even the smallpox vaccine... I'm not sure why you'd say they're just engineering and not science
-
-
i disagree with pretty much everything there but this got tiresome i provided you three links if you'd like to debate with others
-
You disagree with nuclear bombs and computers?
-
I really don't understand your position here. Maybe you say they're "not science" or maybe you think the results are negative. If it's the former, well I think you're defining "science" unusually narrowly. If the latter, well, there are legitimately interesting args eg Ted K
-
Ted is a good topic, but in the end I think he fails to understand how unstoppable tech is. But I respect his viewpoint.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.