Indeed. Imagine a world in which politicians understood behavior genetics, sexual selection, game theory, and IQ.https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1040835370794016769 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Anyway, science & its grounding in reality and testability keep us from spiralling off into Talmudic bullshit
I'm sorry: You believe science STOPS "Talmudic bullshit"? You have it exactly backwardspic.twitter.com/fq7ZfxE0Q1
Testing vs. reality is what stops talmuditry
Let's say it's 3000 BC and you have people arguing about the philosophy of the flat earth etc. There are ways to test this and eventually you can shut the flat earth people up (notwithstanding today's tiny fringe) by collecting enough proof.
(the "philosophy" of the flat earth?) anyway, these simple observations aren't "science" in any modern sense the fact that you're citing 3,000 year old debates is proof of how useless science, as a modern, formalized system, is
We could talk about more recent great achievements of science like the germ theory of disease, evolution and its mechanism, nuclear bombs and power, electricity, computers, and even the smallpox vaccine... I'm not sure why you'd say they're just engineering and not science
i disagree with pretty much everything there but this got tiresome i provided you three links if you'd like to debate with others
You disagree with nuclear bombs and computers?
I really don't understand your position here. Maybe you say they're "not science" or maybe you think the results are negative. If it's the former, well I think you're defining "science" unusually narrowly. If the latter, well, there are legitimately interesting args eg Ted K
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.