Indeed. Imagine a world in which politicians understood behavior genetics, sexual selection, game theory, and IQ.https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1040835370794016769 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I mean SCIENCE! is hyped phaggotry to make aging, childless weak whytes feel smart From global warming to vaccinations to low fat diets to gene theory of evolution (the neo-darwinian synthesis), it's the Emperor has No Clothes and ppl are sick of pretending to believe itpic.twitter.com/x1gLimVgEc
You're conflating pop "science" with actual science. The former includes a lot of misunderstanding of the latter. Actual science is a good thing.
pop science vs real science is a distinction without a difference the new england journal of medicine and bmj are just as full of bullshit as a Neil DeGrasse Tyson lecture, tho maybe a dash less pozhttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/scientific-peer-reviews-are-a-sacred-cow-ready-to-be-slaughtered-says-former-editor-of-bmj-10196077.html …
You should be more discriminating. I know there's plenty of bad science out there, but that doesn't mean the scientific method or science in general is bad.
i am indeed EXTREMELY discriminating the scientific method is a simple system and anybody can game it and even IF they're, miraculously, both honest and objective (p=.01%) the results are intrinsically less certain than assumed John Ioannidis's flash of genius demands respect
Note that I am not endorsing the concept of peer review in general (though it's not all bad)
Anyway, science & its grounding in reality and testability keep us from spiralling off into Talmudic bullshit
I'm sorry: You believe science STOPS "Talmudic bullshit"? You have it exactly backwardspic.twitter.com/fq7ZfxE0Q1
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.