Some thoughts about South Africa in the 50s-80s: Opposition to apartheid increased both internally and internationally. Nonwhites began terror campaigns against it, whites began to think of themselves as oppressors, and the international community imposed increasing penalties.
-
-
So the majority of white people thought: 1. Oppressing people makes us feel bad and takes a lot of effort 2. Lifting sanctions will increase our prosperity 3. The nonwhites will be peaceful and not vindictive 4. Democracy would make everything work out
Show this thread -
What else could they have done? They could have kept going as they were, but that was costing a lot of money. A minority of whites of course realized that democracy would result in them being permanently out of power and subhect to a hostile majority.
Show this thread -
If they were oppressing the 85% nonwhite population while they were in power, why wouldn't the nonwhite population end up oppressing them with the roles reversed under democracy? Was democracy that magical? Why not cut losses and partition the country?
Show this thread -
Let's say it's 1980 and whites are 15% of the population but hold 80% or more of the wealth and land. How do you partition the country? Can you keep 1/2 of the country for yourselves even though you're only 15% of the population? Maybe 40% would go over internationally?
Show this thread -
Hard to say exactly what might have worked, but whites who might have gone for that strategy would have been looking at losing potentially half their property. Better to just blend into a rainbow nation and keep it all, right? (Also, partition is hard!)
Show this thread -
Well I think we know how this turned out. Some managed to sell their assets while the selling was good and escape rather than remain subject to the hostile majority. Others stayed and are currently in the process of losing everything.
Show this thread -
Yes, they managed to retain their holdings for a time and even benefit from the lifting of sanctions, but the gains were fleeting. The majority would never be satisfied with a market dominant minority holding most of the wealth, and democracy would ensure the majority's will.
Show this thread -
-
Addendum: Maybe the whites thought the constitution would protect them? Perhaps it did for a number of years, but now the majority is amending the constitution.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.