Great response:pic.twitter.com/rW6o9H1her
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The left are not "universalist", they're treasonous. They designate the existing society as the "outgroup" and work to marginalize its defenders and empower those intent upon its conquest and subjugation.
The desire to help refugees, starving African children, etc. is mostly genuine
If that were true they would be executing Marshall Plan style programs to establish a proper agricultural sector in Africa and render these third world nations self-sufficient. They do not. They either ship food there making them dependent, or drag people here harming society.
The authenticity of their feelings does not translate into well-thought-out long-term planning. They would not disagree with your plan, but while it occurs they would still demand that everyone wanting to enter the country be let in. Pro-immigration is an essentially emotional
position for leftists. Note the ridiculous overreaction to Trump and Brexit. They demand openness, and movements in the opposite direction deeply hurt them. Also, is there any example of this working? Germany and Japan recovered because of the character of their populations.
But they would disagree with it, as it would involve "colonialism" as a required framework. And Marshall made it work by imposing our culture where needed upon these nations. post-war Japan was distinctly more western than pre-war,&all of Europe were given US constitution clones.
I'm not exactly sure what you mean except that reason won't really work to end conflict here.
Some people are still oblivious and can be converted by observing leftist insanity, so, yes, the way forward is triggering the left
I don't get the impression he *wants* horror
That is the reason why leftists can do things that rightists can not do, namely seriously accuse their opponents of racism. You can not accuse someone who wants to flood your country with Somalis and Afghans of racism, but you can for someone who opposes it. The same for
affirmative action and so on. Now, you may say that these are stupid ideas, that they will cause the deterioration of civilization, that all this is pathological altruism, but pathological altruism is still altruism. You can say that it is ridiculous to be accused of racism
because you want to defend the historic demographics of your country or even make sure your country is not flooded with low IQ hordes, but it does not matter, the leftists will make the accusation because it is a weapon against you. One can reasonably accuse parts of the left of
racism against whites, but as you said, this is not taken very seriously, even for centrists and even rightists, it's simply not the same as being racist against the poor Somalis. So the problem is with the moral and cultural background in which we operate.
Rightists should reject the power of the accusation of racism and the validity of the term itself whenever possible.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.