The "controlled demolition" theories related to 9/11 are completely wrong, and so are most other conspiracy theories. The Atta/Bin Laden conspiracy to fly planes into the buildings (ie the official story) is actually the truth. At worst,the US gov negligently overlooked warnings
-
Show this thread
-
-
Replying to @deplorable_unum
Mostly I think it was structurally weakened by the massive earthquakes (buildings falling) right next to it. I can't remember if there was also a fire there.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx @deplorable_unum
There are some highly and conveniently edited videos of Building 7 that show the building in free fall. I calculated it when I took physics. But in the unedited video, you can see the inside support beams collapsing several seconds before the facade fell.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
If you find the unedited tapes, you can see that it doesn't come down at free fall.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Also, the rear of the building was completely demolished by the collapsing tower. This isn't shown in the "smoking gun," footage of Building 7's collapse.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Skip to 4:20 to see the unedited footage. It's pretty clear what happened.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LUDXpMhkNk …
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @rotholandus14 @deplorable_unum
Are you saying that it was a controlled demolition? Falling like that doesn't necessarily mean it was.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx @deplorable_unum
No, I'm saying the opposite. In the edited tapes, it shows the building collapsing in 6 seconds. In the unedited tapes, the building takes more than 14 seconds to fall - not free fall speed.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams, but it does reduce the strength of structural steel up to 80%
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.