FB as a private enterprise doesn't have an obligation to promote free speech. The issues with"fake news", 1) MSM who cry it to stop competition. 2) Sites like FB who will use outcries to clamp down on it in the US to justify letting foreign governments censor content abroad.
-
-
-
I don't care whether Facebook in fact currently has a legal obligation to promote free speech. Facebook *should* promote free speech due to both a [future] affirmative obligation to promote free speech and feelings of personal responsibility to promote free speech.
-
They should promote free speech. We can't force them to do it and ultimately the market will decide Facebook's fate. The whole fake news thing is being used to shut down competitors to the MSM and as way for Facebook to justify silencing dissident voices in oppressive countries.
-
The market won't always work due to network effects. The proposed
#shallnotcensor law is necessary -
Those same network effects that where going to make Microsoft our masters at the turn of the century?
-
Yet we still pay tribute to Microsoft with every Windows computer, despite their technological stagnation
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
100% riding the institutional power gravy train.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm sure this is big news for the dwindling group of perimenopausal box wine enthusiasts that still use Zuck the Cuck's hypertrophied mommyblog
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Fact Checkers" who are subservient to the HR department. Nanny no!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.