If the tech giants want to censor political speech & advance a political viewpoint, fine. But then they should be treated like any other publisher
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We need to move the
#Section230 debate into the 21st century. Question is no longer how to encourage an infant industry. Question is whether the industry’s biggest, monopoly platforms can use 230 to stifle competition, censor speech, and invade privacyShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm impressed, Rep Hawley. You know what you're talking about. Thank you for taking up this effort. It's embarrassing how little some of our reps know about online tech as it is used (and manipulated) irl.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So the fairness doctrine for digital. Remember when republicans were against the nanny state regulating speech? Good times, good times.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Big tech social media algorithms, financed by CIA rogue assets ARE the online "speech police." Ironic,
@HawleyMO legislating to use existing laws to hold them accountable. More govt control? or more free speech to the people?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No Facebook has taken that upon themselves they are tyrants.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank you!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Curious that nobody has mentioned the sex-trafficking: freedom of speech correlation! An off simile, that...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.