And in yesterday’s hearing, he told me he has no problem with what he said. That should be a BIG problem for everyone who cares about religious liberty
Show this thread
No, Ed, it’s not an excuse for a lawyer who compares faithful Catholics to KKK members & radical imams to say “I was just representing my clients.” He could have chosen any number of analogies. He chose to deploy vicious anti-faith rhetorichttps://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/district-court-nominees-in-blue-states/ …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If Bogren considers himself to be an expert in constitutional law, I don't understand why he is accepting a case in which his client's argument is in violation of constitutionally protected religious liberties.
-
"The KKK is constitutionally protected" lol
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even more concerning is Bogren’s apparent contempt for the Supreme Court’s Masterpiece Cake decision one of the most important religious liberty decisions of our times
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If the hood fits ...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank you for standing up for religious liberty!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You triggered bro?
-
"Put simply, the power of Congress to conduct investigations is inherent in the legislative process."- Judge Edgardo Ramoshttps://www.axios.com/deutsche-bank-subpoena-trump-financial-records-a6e8e4e6-f8a8-4464-8c8b-cb373e1ce5d7.html …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.