You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Twitter recently banned a Marine vet & conservative pundit, Jesse Kelly, without explanation. This follows Twitter’s ban of Canadian feminist Megan Murphy for her speech. @jack told Congress Twitter doesn’t target political speech. Is that true?
The new Congress needs to investigate and find out. Twitter is exempt from liability as a “publisher” because it is allegedly “a forum for a true diversity of political discourse.” That does not appear to be accurate.
You're a lawyer and a senator-elect. You should probably make it a priority to understand both the first amendment and the cda sec. 230 because you don't seem to understand either.
This is what's important to you?? We have 12 years to do something about climate change and you want congress to investigate Twitter because somebody got banned??
If they were sincere that would be one thing. Non-controversial progressive accounts are getting taken down fairly often. But this is clearly political smoke and mirrors by a party that knows they're dying.
You may find this bit of the US Code illuminating: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230 …
As long as you’re in there, please check out the emoluments clause: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/emoluments_clause … Or is investigating foreign influence on a @POTUS less important than a private company’s moderation practices?pic.twitter.com/sV4S7Q20iJ
Maybe you should hire a lawyer to re-explain section 230 for you.
I find it shocking that an attorney and soon to be Senator could misread Section 230 so badly. It's not even that complicated.
Question, Josh: how were you the attorney general of *anything*, since you clearly know sweet fuck-all about the law here.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
