Agree, but I would say entire judiciary using catch-22 type standing & laches to dismiss cases on technicalities without having to do any factual discovery is root cause of frustration.
The Supreme Court. It is the proper forum for settling disputes. Texas brought a very comprehensive case on unconstitutional election arrangements. They should have let the two sides argue their case and made the call. Instead they punted. That makes them most responsible.https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1347895735736356867 …
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What did they think would happen? What the Supreme Court did epitomizes the arrogance and contempt of the elites. They're incapable of understanding that 70 million people wouldn't be OK with Supreme Court justices serving their own personal interests first and foremost.
-
Cracks me up that 3 of them were Trump appointees
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I blame the legislatures. They had the power to do what they needed to do. They could have called themselves into session certified electors and forced those that didn’t agree to file suit. Instead they wussed out with “the gov won’t let us meet”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Agreed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great point
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The idea that states have no standing to sue other states who break their own laws to jack the vote and change outcomes of elections is patently absurd and our Supreme Court is corrupt.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.