This is one of the reasons why Woke Capital does what it does - to manage their legal risk
@WokeCapitalhttps://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/world/google-says-fired-48-for-sexual-harassment-over-two-years-10865836 …
-
-
Replying to @HalifaxShadow @WokeCapital
I’m totally with you but can you elaborate on the mechanics?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eli_schiff @WokeCapital
As different groups have different mean abilities their outcomes will always be different. Every big companies is always at risk for individual and class action lawsuits for discrimination as a result. 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Thus, you protect yourself with high profile firings and Woke initiatives so you look like a hard target. You’ve got stuff to show the judge and jury that you are ideologically clean and that you do not systematically discriminate against your incompetent bioleninist trash.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HalifaxShadow @WokeCapital
Def with you on those parts. But they didn’t do this for a decade plus. And they didn’t do it to Rubin. They compensated him handsomely. How come?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eli_schiff @WokeCapital
He would have been due contractual severance and / or the sum relates to deferred options or grants that have to be paid out when he's terminated.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I don't know anything about the timing of this individual matter, but companies have been making examples of firing people for "sexual harassment" for a number of years - at least 15 years.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.