except we have no evidence of them speaking a common language
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
We know for a fact there's no genetic link between them. Some say there's linguistic evidence, relying on the idea that Lusitanian languages are 'Celtic' - an unverifiable claim.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nastyinmuhtaxi
I think we need to distinguish between strong & weak arguments: Strong: the iron age inhabitants of Gaul were similar enough such that they appeared to be a similar culture to their outgroup and wandered around occaisonally Weak: these pepo also lived in Ireland and the UK
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PseudoDositheus @rhyncophorous
That "strong" argument is in fact weak. All the sources we have about so-called "Celts" are co-dependent and mostly derive from Herodotus. I've seen every single iteration of the word 'Celt' in Greek and Latin printed on five A4 pages, 95% are based on a single use...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nastyinmuhtaxi
The Gallic invasion of Greece happened 200 years after Herodotus died...? Was Strabo just making shit up when he connected the two?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PseudoDositheus @nastyinmuhtaxi
Like he's pretty clear in Geography who is "Celtae" and who isn't - that's what I'm using as my definition
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @PseudoDositheus
Yeah, it's Strabo's definition, he wrote half a millennium after it happened, it doesn't mean shit.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nastyinmuhtaxi
He's pretty clear here that the Galatians (who invaded Turkey in 275bc) and the Galli of France share a common heritage I think we're arguing past one another herepic.twitter.com/EN3El0ZkaX
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Yeah, like it’s “pretty clear” to the Byzantines that Kipchaks are “Scythians”.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
