How mant arrests for FGM in London?https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46106224 …
Same reason they advise for male circumcision. Politics and money.
-
-
http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/female-genital-mutilation … maybe you should educate yourself
-
WHO is another corrupt UN lobby. Same as the one who gave an Oscar to the Syrian Al-qaeda (aka white helmets)
-
Yes obviously ,if it was about money then it would continue because theres nothing easy about correcting FGM .If it was about politics then the world politicians would not be agreeing to it ,and its nothing to do with religion
-
If WHO could medicalize the practice and have doctors make tons of money off of it they would. The problem is the optics wouldn't be good in the current Western mindset. In reality female circumcision was very common in the 19th century Europe and America.
-
and then banned for good reason ,its does more harm than good .
-
They only banned it in 1996 in the US.
-
Does not matter if it was banned last week ,its still banned for the same reason ,it does more harm than good
-
Practices like these are banned for political reasons not medical. The public perceived it as "African Savagery" therefore it was banned an act of cultural supremacy.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.