That is not factually correct.
-
-
-
Science doesn't agree with you
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Science doesn't agree with you
- Show replies
-
-
-
Even IF you argue they are biologically male ('cause XY, y'know) - that doesn't mean they can't be women in terms of gender expression and alignment. XY and being a manly man man are two completely different things.
-
Except womanhood is not and should not be defined by “gender alignment.” Womanhood =/= femininity, and arguing that it does contributes to misogyny and the alienation of gender non-conforming women, who are often lesbians. People the HRC purports to champion.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You misspelled “AM”
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
*literally are. Sorry, but that’s a fact.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.