It's not though. In both cases, the number should be zero.
That isn't how analogies working for ethical arguments work. Do you think bad things should still be addressed if they happen often but not constantly or not? If your answer is 'Yes, when its murder, not when its unfair dismissal or censorship' you cannot think the latter v bad.
-
-
If you don't think unfair dismissal and censorship are bad, do you think this consistently. eg, if its OK to sack or no-platform someone for saying rape culture does not exist, is it also OK to sack or no-platform someone for saying rape culture does exist?
-
It really depends. As we agreed earlier, the point would have to be delivered in a way consistent with the educational mission of the university.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.