I approve protests which are highly visible but not obstructive even if I don't support the cause. This is freedom of expression done right. It expresses itself without suppressing anyone else's expression.
-
-
Ok, thanks for clarification. Sometimes, though, speech might be curtailed if it constitutes harassment, eg anti abortion protestors assailing women seeking abortions at clinics. Maybe in that case the protestors are obstructing others from exercising their rights.
-
Yes, I was torn on that one but came down on the side of moving them just far enough away so the women could go and hear what they had to say if they wanted to but could just walk straight in without having to. Also banning Britain First from the entrance of mosques.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.